Afzal guru conspired and was in touch with terrorists before attack. In safari, when i click download pdf on somebodys instructable, it first looks like its going to download, but nothing really happens. Mohammed afzal having aided these attackers was sentenced to death based on the evidence placed before the trial court, the high court and the sc. The apex court s verdict which sentenced afzal guru to death may not stand ground if examined in the light of the treatment of evidence in a later case. This article makes the issue of no legal aide provided to afzal guru as no issue. Seven members of the security force were also killed in the said encounter. Schools cant expel students without court s permission. Supreme court building is big, but not the largest public building in washington. Pakistan oppn to approach court challenging ptis candidate win in senate elections. Tour the neoclassical architecture of the highest court.
Feb, 20 claiming that guru did not get a fair trial, the lawyers said he was a victim of prejudice and injustice built into the criminal judicial process. Cat single members order not sustainable, high court. The hanging of afzal guru is a stain on indias democracy. You will be aware, sir, that the supreme court has without explanation rejected the curative petition filed by mohd. But after supreme court in its 5 august 2005 judgment upheld his death sentence, guru would be asked by his kashmiri and pakistani inmates and even some visiting sleuths to seek president of indias clemency. The curious case of hanging afzal guru journal of law and. Much has been reported on afzal s controversial hanging and a lot is still being reported. Sep 10, 2010 the death sentence was confirmed by the delhi high court on october 29, 2003 and by the supreme court on august 4, 2005. What supreme court said when it upheld death for afzal guru three years after parliament attack convict afzal guru was hanged in tihar jail, his execution continues to fuel powerful debates, protests, charges of sedition, and accusations of being antinational. It was broadcast only a few days before the fasttrack court sentenced geelani and afzal and showkat guru to death. Shaukat hussain guru was released from delhis tihar jail on dec 30, 2010. Afzal guru indian parliament attack case convict hanged. If the countrys nine justices wind up deciding the presidential race, things could get very ugly very quickly.
This article does not cite the evidence that got afzal guru indicted. Supreme court s judgement on death penalty a humane approach. On dec, 2001, five gunmen who tried to storm the heavily guarded parliament complex were shot dead by the security personnel. Indeed, public discourse about both the supreme court judgement that assuaged the nations collective conscience and the 2001 attack that aimed to destabilise the seat of democracy in india indict guru as an enemy of the state and, by extension, the people it governs. But in its 5 august 2005 judgment it gave afzal guru three life sentences and a double death. Every criminal trial is a voyage of discovery in which truth is the quest. Architect cass gilbert used ancient designs for the 20th century u. Page 21 of 24 satbir lochan singh chowdry 300007 human rights in the developing world bibliography baxi, upendra. For all the latest explained news, download indian express app. India fails to answer critical questions in jadhav case. The death sentence was upheld by delhi high court on october 29, 2003 and finally his appeal was rejected by the supreme court two years later on august 4, 2005. Nov 27, 2018 the president is entitled to go into the merits of the case notwithstanding that it has been judicially concluded by the consideration given to it by the supreme court.
The case had gone against him afzal in the apex court. The judgment faced widespread criticism on three grounds lack of proper. After ordering demolition of ravidas temple delhi, supreme. This judgment of the high court has given rise to these seven appealstwo appeals preferred by shaukat hussain guru and one appeal preferred by mohd. The supreme court observed that it is, therefore, the duty of every court to award proper sentence having regard to the nature of the offence and the manner in which it was executed or committed, etc. Dec 17, 2012 the supreme court judgment, in the case of sangeet v. The death sentence was upheld by delhi high court on october 29, 2003 and finally his appeal was rejected by the supreme court two years later on. Another reason why capital punishment must be abolished is that in case a judgement is erroneous, the mistake cannot be reversed. Bachan was a supreme court constitutional judgment that laid down the landmark principle of the rarest of the rare, which established guidelines on how to determine whether a death sentence was to be awarded or not. The human rights forum hrf strongly condemns the execution. The number of justices that make up the supreme court was set in 1869, but that does not mean the courts composition has been free of controversy. Afzal guru is hunged the kashmir valley mourns the death of this martyr while the rest of the country believes a terrorist has served his sentence.
The decision to hang afzal was taken after all these developments. The apex courts verdict which sentenced afzal guru to death may not stand ground if. Shaukat hussain guru news and updates from the economic. The supreme court had while upholding afzal guru s death sentence had termed the attack on parliament in 2001 as an unparalelled assault on the supreme seat of democracy. Curfew in kashmir in a protest against the hanging of the afzal guru, 2 persons have been said to be injured in clash with the security forces in north kashmirs. Afzal guru was awarded death sentence by a delhi court on december 18, 2002 after being.
Afzal guru was awarded death sentence by a delhi court on december 18, 2002 after being convicted of conspiracy to attack parliament on december, 2001. Jun 29, 2020 in the case of afzal guru, supreme court of india had said the following in the judgement, as is the case with most conspiracies, there is and could be no direct evidence amounting to criminal conspiracy. Feb 09, 20 the secrecy surrounding afzal s execution, like in the kasab case, is very disturbing and raises serious questions about procedural fairness. They called afzal guru hanging judicial killing and apex. There was not even an iota of evidence produced by the prosecution to link afzal with. List of people who signed afzal gurus mercy petition. Colin gonsalves was afzal s defence lawyer in the high court. The committee for the protection of democratic rights cpdr, mumbai strongly condemns the hanging of afzal guru by the indian state.
Afzal guru indian parliament attack case convict hanged in. Jan 14, 2020 guru s letter was addressed to lawyer sushil kumar, who represented him in the supreme court. In a supreme court judgement in 2005, shaukats punishment was reduced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment, whilst afzal s sentence was extended to three life. The court backed the high courts view that the criticism against the. The bench had said transcripts of the call details established that mohammed had spoken to guru that he along with others were going to execute the plan. Feb 11, 20 the supreme court awarded the death penalty driven by the enormity of the crime and public expectations of what would be a just sentence. State of haryana, delivered on november 20 could make the government give the benefit of the doubt to 14 deathrow convicts including afzal. The legislative and executive branches of the federal government are balanced by the judicial branch, which is led by the united states supreme court. Delivering the judgment, it said, the collective conscience of the society will be satisfied if the capital punishment is awarded to the offender. Three eminent senior advocates mr ram jethmalani, mr shanti bhushan and mr sushil kumar have appeared in the supreme court on behalf of the accused. In its 271page judgement delivered on august 4, 2005, a division bench of justice p v reddi and justice p p naolekar had said there was. Supreme courts judgement on death penalty a humane approach.
In defense of afzal guru,we do not need pakistan ramani. What supreme court said when it upheld death for afzal guru three years after parliament attack convict afzal guru was hanged in tihar jail, his execution continues to fuel powerful debates, protests, charges of. Afzal s trial then proceeded without a defence lawyer. Afzal guru was sentenced to death on february 20 for his role in the december 2001 attacks on the indian parliament. In the light of the supreme court judgments, we have now draw a balance sheet of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. The incident, which resulted in heavy casualties had shaken the entire nation, and the collective.
They have also strongly disagreed with the reasoning in the supreme court s judgment saying that afzal guru had to be hanged to satisfy the collective conscience of indians. A ray of hope for afzal, other deathrow prisoners the hindu. Although most of the evidence against him was circumstantial, guru was sentenced to a double death sentence in 2005. The 2020 election could be decided by the supreme court the atlantic. Feb 09, 20 later on afshan guru and sar geelani were given benefit of doubt and released by the supreme court. Pdf the evidentiary value of retracted confessions. The journey, in the present case, has been navigated by the designated judge of the special court constituted under section 23 of the prevention of terrorists activities act, 2002 hereinafter referred to as pota. At a time when a controversial event organised by a group of jnu students in support of executed terrorist afzal guru has unleashed a political storm in the country, former home minister and senior congress leader p chidambaram has raised serious doubts over the degree of his involvement in the 2001 parliament attacks.
The supreme court of india acquitted mohammad afzal of the charges of belonging to any terrorist organisation. Supreme court termed afzal guru a menace to the society while taking away his right to life in its 271page judgement delivered on august 4, 2005, a division bench had said there was clinching evidence against afzal guru regarding his nexus with the terrorists who carried out the attack on parliament in 2001. After the supreme court judgment confirming death penalty on afzal guru and the rejection of his mercy petition,the legal and logical course was to execute the death sentence. When justice ruth bader ginsburg passed away on september 18, 2020, many americans didnt take the proper time to grieve instead, they panicked about what her passing meant for the future of the country. The selfstyled activists and various civil society groups had questioned the legality of the capital punishment to guru. Three years after parliament attack convict afzal guru was hanged in tihar jail.
It has to be noted, that in its judgement of 5 august 2005, the supreme court admitted that the. Jan 25, 2020 the last execution that gupta had to oversee in his career was that of afzal guru s on 9 february 20. Afzal gurus lawyers withdraw as counsel of his family. What afzal guru wrote about davinder singh and parliament. Feb 25, 2016 afzal guru s case was perhaps not correctly decided.
I am picking up this from wikipedia it has to be noted, that in its judgement of 5 august 2005, the supreme court admitted that the evidence against guru was only circumstantial, and that there was no evidence that he belonged to any terrorist group or organisation, writes harshit. Subsequently the high court acquitted geelani and afsan guru. Ajmal kasab mumbai 2611 attacker case judgement details. Afzal guru, sentenced to death in the parliament attack case.
Mar 08, 20 on appeal to the high court, both geelanithe alleged mastermind of the attacksand afzan were acquitted, however the death sentences of afzal and shaukat guru were upheld. Aug 15, 2019 a few days ago, the supreme court of india had ordered demolition of guru ravidas temple in delhi and dda carried out that order to destroy historical place for millions of dalits. Jun 10, 2018 supreme court case analysis state nct of delhi v. You have reached your limit for free articles this month. Dec 24, 2017 the current discourse over the three judgments, coming one after another in 2g scam, adrash scam and the fodder scam reminds of a similar debate over the conviction of parliament attack accused afzal guru. Indian supreme court judgement 2005 in mohammad afzal guru. That petition was the last option available to him through the courts. Cat single members order not sustainable, high court told. Supreme court termed afzal guru a menace to the society. Hanging of afzal guru exposes the cynicism of terror politics. Hanging of afzal guru analysis of supreme court judgement. Glorification of terrorists by a section of media and activists. Social action litigation in the supreme court of india.
His hanging in delhis tihar jail aimed to satisfy the collective conscience of society, in the words of the supreme court judgement. Gilani and afsan guru were brought to the operation cell, lodhi colony. On dec, 2001, five gunmen who tried to storm the heavily guarded parliament. Indian supreme court judgement 2005 in mohammad afzal guru s case. Here is an unedited transcript of the letter afzal guru wrote. All i get is a blank dark gray window on the new tab that a. Feb 10, 20 subsequently the high court acquitted geelani and afsan guru. The curious case of afzal guru has given rise to issues which lie. The standing permanent structure of guru ravidas temple in tughlaqabad was dismantled by dda after which protests across india, especially punjab and delhi, had erupted. Let us download the facts emerging from the cell phone records. Aug 08, 2016 the supreme court is often regarded as infallible.
The supreme court judgement may be downloaded from this link. Extihar jailer opens up about afzal guru, sobhraj, nirbhaya. The only reason given for this was that, since afzal guru was not willing to make a confession before court, for the purpose of the investigation, they had to add the offences under pota so that a confession could be recorded before a police officer. Mohammad afzal guru was a kashmiri separatist, who was convicted for his role in the 2001. The supreme court refused to postpone the screening, saying that the media would not in. Of the three sentenced to death, sar geelani who was presented as the mastermind behind the attack, shaukat hussain guru and afzal guru, only afzal guru s penalty was upheld by the supreme court. Later as afzal sahab became my cellmate, he told me how he had turned down the government lawyer offer in pota trial court. At the end of a 5 year trial he was convicted by the supreme court and sentenced to death. Grant faint getty images there are nine members of the supreme court, and that number has. In the letter, guru protests his innocence and repeatedly claims that he was falsely incriminated in the parliament attack case.
Biographies of current supreme court justices when an unconstitutional bill passes congress and is signed by the president, or when it is passed by a state legislature and sign. But judges are human and the court s verdicts should not be immune to criticism, particularly when they pertain to the death penalty. The judgement of the trial court the special court which was presided by mr s. In its 271page judgement delivered on august 4, 2005, a division bench of justice p v reddi and justice p p naolekar had said there was clinching evidence against guru regarding his nexus with the terrorists who carried. There, the justices make some of the most important decisions in american society. What do recent supreme court decisions mean for the us. A supreme court judgment on death sentences has raised hopes for parliament attack convict mohd afzal guru and 14 others waiting in the death queue. Dingra convicted three of the four accused who were mohd. Afzal gurus case was perhaps not correctly decided.
519 70 871 915 1237 77 1275 534 28 244 1534 1011 900 999 587 918 849 105 1478 417 636 126 7 1291 1554 903 265 446 326